Personality Attributes Influencing OB
In the dynamic world of organizational behavior, understanding the diverse traits and characteristics of employees is essential for fostering a productive and harmonious workplace.
Key personality attributes such as locus of control, Machiavellianism, self-esteem, self-monitoring, risk-taking, and personality types play a significant role in shaping how individuals approach their roles, interact with others, and contribute to the organization’s goals.
By recognizing these traits, managers can design effective strategies that motivate employees, enhance team collaboration, and optimize performance.
In this post, we’ll explore 6 key personality attributes and their impact on organizational behavior.
Locus of Control
Locus of control refers to the extent to which individuals believe they have control over the events affecting their lives.
In organizational behavior, this attribute significantly influences how employees perceive their roles and responsibilities.
Internal Locus of Control: Individuals with an internal locus of control believe they can influence outcomes through their actions and decisions.
In the workplace, they tend to take initiative, assume responsibility, and persist through challenges, making them valuable in roles that require self-motivation and problem-solving.
External Locus of Control: Conversely, those with an external locus of control attribute outcomes to external factors like luck or fate.
They may struggle with accountability and could be less proactive in their roles, relying on direction from others.
Understanding employees’ locus of control helps managers design appropriate motivational strategies.
For instance, those with an internal locus might thrive with more autonomy, while those with an external locus may benefit from structured environments with clear guidance and feedback.
Machiavellianism
Machiavellianism refers to a personality trait characterized by manipulation, a lack of empathy, and a pragmatic, often ruthless, approach to achieving goals.
In organizational behavior, high Machiavellians can be both a challenge and an asset.
Influence on OB: Individuals high in Machiavellianism are often skilled at negotiation and persuasion, which can be advantageous in competitive business settings.
However, their tendency to prioritize personal gain over organizational well-being can lead to unethical behavior and a toxic work environment.
Management Strategies: Organizations must ensure robust ethical standards and transparent policies to prevent exploitation by high Machiavellians.
Effective leadership involves balancing their strategic acumen with the organization’s ethical values to harness their strengths while mitigating potential harm.
Self-Esteem
Self-esteem pertains to an individual’s overall sense of self-worth or personal value. It affects how employees perceive their capabilities and contributions within an organization.
High Self-Esteem: Employees with high self-esteem are generally confident, motivated, and more resilient to stress.
They tend to perform well, seek challenging tasks, and contribute positively to team dynamics, which is crucial for leadership roles and innovation.
Low Self-Esteem: Those with low self-esteem may doubt their abilities, avoid risks, and require more support from management.
They might underperform or experience higher levels of workplace anxiety, impacting their productivity and satisfaction.
Organizations can foster positive self-esteem by creating supportive work environments, offering constructive feedback, and recognizing achievements to boost employees’ confidence and engagement.
Self-Monitoring
Self-monitoring is the ability to regulate behavior to fit social situations. High self-monitors are adaptable and sensitive to social cues, which can be advantageous in diverse organizational settings.
High Self-Monitors: These individuals can adjust their behavior to align with organizational norms and expectations, making them effective in roles requiring interpersonal interaction, such as sales or customer service.
They are often perceived as flexible and cooperative.
Low Self-Monitors: On the other hand, low self-monitors may struggle with adapting to changing environments or expectations, potentially causing friction in team settings.
However, they tend to be more authentic and consistent in their behavior.
Understanding self-monitoring levels helps managers place employees in roles that suit their strengths, enhancing team cohesion and productivity.
Read More: Emotions in OB
Risk-Taking
Risk-taking reflects an individual’s willingness to engage in behaviors that involve uncertainty and potential loss.
In organizational behavior, risk-takers can drive innovation and change but also pose challenges if not well-managed.
High Risk-Takers: They are often entrepreneurial, quick decision-makers who thrive in dynamic environments.
They push boundaries and encourage innovation, essential for competitive and fast-paced industries.
Low Risk-Takers: These individuals prefer stability and are more thorough in decision-making, reducing the likelihood of errors. They excel in roles requiring meticulous planning and risk management.
Balancing risk-taking within teams ensures a mix of innovative ideas and careful execution, fostering sustainable growth and minimizing potential downsides.
Read More: Perceived Organizational Support
Type-A vs. Type-B Personality
The Type-A and Type-B personality framework describes individuals based on their stress responses and work behavior.
Type A Personality: These individuals are highly competitive and goal-oriented and often experience higher stress levels.
In the workplace, they are driven and efficient but may struggle with teamwork and burnout. They thrive in high-pressure environments like sales or management.
Type B Personality: Type B individuals are more relaxed, patient, and less stressed by competition.
They perform well in collaborative settings and are more adaptable to fluctuating workloads.
Their calm demeanor can help stabilize teams during high-pressure situations.
Organizations benefit from understanding these personality types to manage workloads effectively and maintain a balanced, productive environment, leveraging the strengths of both personality types for optimal performance.
Hence, these are the 6 key personality attributes influencing organizational behavior.
Read Next: 5 Models of OB

Sujan Chaudhary is an MBA graduate. He loves to share his business knowledge with the rest of the world. While not writing, he will be found reading and exploring the world.